IJE TRANSACTIONS B: Applications Vol. 30, No. 11 (November 2017) 1498-1507    Article in Press

PDF URL: http://www.ije.ir/Vol30/No11/B/22.pdf  
downloaded Downloaded: 0   viewed Viewed: 68

A. Sarlak, H. Saeedmonir and C. Gheyretmand
( Received: July 10, 2017 – Accepted: September 08, 2017 )

Abstract    In the present work, the effect of Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) in structures resting on a soft soil, through numerical modelling and shaking table tests have been studied. In theoretical studies two types of models namely fixed base and flexible base structure were subjected to three selected earthquake records. Fully Nonlinear method was employed for analyzing all of the numerical models and Finite Element Method (FEM) was used for modelling soil beneath the structure. In order to verify the outputs of the numerical modelling, shaking table tests were carried out. In experimental tests, scaled form of the main structure, according to scaling laws was built. Laminar Shear Box (LSB) as a container, was built to implement soil in the soil-structure model on the shaking table. By comparison between the numerical modelling and the shaking table tests results, a good agreement was observed. Therefore, the results of the comparison between the fixed base and the flexible base, in the numerical modelling are reliable. In this study, was demonstrated that if the structure rested on the soft soil, is located in a site which is susceptible to experience strong earthquakes, the necessity of considering SSI effects is avoidable.


Keywords    Soil-Structure Interaction, Fully nonlinear analysis, Shaking table tests, Laminar Shear Box


چکیده    دراین پژوهش به صورت تئوریک و آزمایشگاهی اثر اندرکنش خاک وسازه برای سازهایی که برروی خاک سست قرار دارند، مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. مدل‌‌های عددی شامل دو دسته می‌‌باشند: سازه با بستر صلب و سازه با بسترانعطاف پذیر، که همگی تحت سه رکورد زلزله منتخب قرار گرفته‌‌اند. تحلیل دینامکی غیر خطی برروی تمامی مدل‌‌های عددی صورت پذیرفت و به منظور مدلسازی خاک از روش اجزا محدود استفاده گردید. به منظور راستی آزمایی نتایج مدلسازی عددی، آزمایشات میز لرزه انجام شد. در آزمایشات صورت گرفته، سازه مقیاس شده، بر اساس قوانین حاکم بر مقیاس بندی ساخته شد. جعبه برشی لایه‌‌ای برای منظورکردن خاک در مدلهای آزمایشگاهی میز لرزه ،ساخته شد. مقایسه نتایج مدلسازی‌‌های عددی و تست‌‌های آزمایشگاهی موید انطباق کامل آنها می‌‌باشد. از این رو نتایج بدست آمده درشبیه‌‌سازی‌‌های عددی که از مقایسه مدل‌‌های تئوریک دو دسته سازه های با بستر صلب و سازه‌‌ها با بستر انعطاف پذیر عاید شده‌‌اند نتایجی قابل اطمینان تلقی می‌‌شود. در این تحقیق نشان داده شد که ضرورت منظور کردن اثر اندرکنش خاک و سازه برای سازه‌‌هایی که برروی خاک شل قرار دارند و در مکان‌‌هایی واقع شدند که مستعد تجربه زلزله های شدید هستند، اجتناب ناپذیر است.

References    1. Wolf, J.P., “Simple physical models for foundation dynamics”, Third International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Vol. ΙΙ, (1995), paper (No. SOA9). 2. Dutta, S.C., Roy, R., "A critical review on idealization and modeling for interaction among soil-foundation-structure system" Computers & structures, Vol. 80, (2002), 1579-1594. 3. Roesset, J. M., M.Ettouney, M., "Transmitting boundaries: a comparison" International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 1, (1977), 151-176. 4. Kocak, S., Mengi, Y., "A simple soil–structure interaction model", Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 24, (2000), 607-635. 5. Hosseini, S.M.M.M. and Pajouh, M.A., “Comparative study on the equivalent linear and the fully nonlinear site response analysis approaches”,  Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 5,  (2012), 587-597. 6. Gazetas, G., Mylonakis, G., "Seismic soil-structure interaction: new evidence and emerging issues", Geotechnical Special Publication 75, Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics III, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, (1998), 1119-1174. 7. Dutta, S. C., et al, "Response of low-rise buildings under seismic ground excitation incorporating soil–structure interaction", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 24, (2004), 893-914. 8. Azarbakht, A., Ashtiany, M. G., "Influence of the Soil‐Structure Interaction on the Design of Steel‐Braced Building Foundation", Aip Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1020, No. 1, (2008), 595-601.  9. Tavakoli, H. R., et al., "Response of RC structures subjected to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions considering soil-structure interaction", International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4, (2011), 881-896. 10. Yan, L., Byrne, P.M., "Application of hydraulic gradient similitude method to small-scale footing tests on sand", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 26, (1989), 246-259. 11. Bathurst, R. J., et al. "A simple displacement model for response analysis of EPS geofoam seismic buffers." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 4, (2007), 344-353. 12. Fishman, K.L., et al., “Laboratory study of seismic free-field response of sand”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, (1995),  33-43. 13. Jafarzadeh, B., “Design and evaluation concepts of laminar shear box for 1G shaking table tests”, Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, (2004), paper (No. 1391). 14. Meymand, P.J., “Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay”, Doctoral dissertation, Departmant  of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, (1998). 15. Lu, X.L., et al, “Shaking table model testing on dynamic soil-structure interaction system” ,13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, (2004), 1-16. 16. Tabatabaiefar, H.R., Mansoury, B., “Detail design, building and commissioning of tall building structural models for experimental shaking table tests”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 25, No. 8, (2016), 357-374. 17. Dietz, M., Muir Wood, D., “Shaking table evaluation of dynamic soil properties”, Proceedings of 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Greece, (2007), paper (No. 1196). 18. Ishimura, K., et al, “Sway-rocking model for simulating nonlinear response of sandy deposit with structure”, Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, (1992), 1897-1903. 19. Turan, A., et al, “Design and commissioning of a laminar soil container for use on small shaking tables”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 2, (2009), 404-414. 20. Guoxing, C., et al, “Shaking-table tests and numerical simulations on a subway structure in soft soil”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 76, (2015), 13-28. 21. Rocha, M., “The possibility of solving soil mechanics problems by the use of models”, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, London, 1957, Vol.  1,  183-188. 22. Moncarz, P.D., Krawinkler, H., “Theory and application of experimental model analysis in earthquake engineering”, Report No. 50, John Blume Earthquake Engineering Ctr . , Stanford Univ, (1981). 23. Iai, S., “Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field”, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 29, No. 1, (1989), 105-118. 24. Rayhani, M.H., El Naggar, M.H., “Numerical modelling of seismic response of rigid foundation on soft soil”, International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 8, No. 6, (2008), 336-346. 25. Hardin, B.O., Drnevich, V.P., “Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves”, Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div, Vol. 98, No. 7, (1972), 672-692. 26. Lysmer, J., Kuhlemeyer, R.L., “Finite dynamic model for infinite media”, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 95, No. 4, (1969), 859-878. 27. ASCE/SEI 7-10, ASCE standard., "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures", American Society of Civil Engineers, (2006). 28. FEMA-350. “Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings”, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), (2000).

Download PDF 

International Journal of Engineering
E-mail: office@ije.ir
Web Site: http://www.ije.ir