Direct Shear Tests on Soft Clay Reinforced with Single Ordinary Granular Column: Discrete Element-Finite Difference Method

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Civil Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

A great deal of research has been conducted on the performance of granular columns under vertical loads. However, in some situations, the movement of the soil mass can lead to lateral deformations and, as a result, shear stresses in the soil and columns. The primary objective of the present study is to numerically investigate the shear performance of soft clay soil improved with a single Ordinary Granular Column (OGC) in the direct shear test using a hybrid Discrete Element-Finite Difference Method (DEM-FDM). The numerical modeling method was first validated by simulating a direct shear test conducted previously on a soft clay-OGC composite in the laboratory. Afterward, an extensive parametric study was conducted to determine how various factors affect the shear strength of clay-OGC composites. According to the results, increasing the area replacement ratio from 15 to 35% can increase the peak shear strength of clay-OGC composites in the direct shear test by up to two times, depending on the level of applied normal stress. The micro-scale results also indicated that the surface roughness of soil particles in OGC has a greater effect on the shear strength of clay-OGC composites than their angularity. Furthermore, the results showed that the equivalent friction angle of clay-OGC composites should be calculated based on the residual friction angle of granular soil used in OGC.

Graphical Abstract

Direct Shear Tests on Soft Clay Reinforced with Single Ordinary Granular Column: Discrete Element-Finite Difference Method

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Shahmandi A, Ghazavi M, Barkhordari K, Hashemi M. The Effect of Using Reinforced Granular Blanket and Single Stone Column on Improvement of Sandy Soil: Experimental Study. Int J Eng. 2023;36(8):1532-47. 10.5829/ije.2023.36.08b.13
  2. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical evaluation. Geotext Geomembr. 2006;24(6):349-58. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.05.001
  3. Yoo C, Kim S-B. Numerical modeling of geosynthetic-encased stone column-reinforced ground. Geosynth Int. 2009;16(3):116-26. 10.1680/gein.2009.16.3.116
  4. Khabbazian M, Kaliakin VN, Meehan CL. Numerical study of the effect of geosynthetic encasement on the behaviour of granular columns. Geosynth Int. 2010;17(3):132-43. 10.1680/gein.2010.17.3.132
  5. Abdelhamid M, Ali N, Abdelaziz T. A Literature Review of Factors Affecting the Behavior of Encased Stone Columns. Geotech Geol Eng. 2023;41(6):3253-88. 10.1007/s10706-023-02492-8
  6. Mazumder T, Rolaniya AK, Ayothiraman R. Experimental study on behaviour of encased stone column with tyre chips as aggregates. Geosynth Int. 2018;25(3):259-70. 10.1680/jgein.18.00006
  7. Mohapatra SR, Rajagopal K, Sharma J. Direct shear tests on geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Geotext Geomembr. 2016;44(3):396-405. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.01.002
  8. Aslani M, Nazariafshar J, Ganjian N. Experimental Study on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils Reinforced with Stone Columns. Geotech Geol Eng. 2019;37(3):2165-88. 10.1007/s10706-018-0752-z
  9. Murugesan S, Rajagopal K. Shear Load Tests on Stone Columns With and Without Geosynthetic Encasement. Geotech Test J. 2009;32(1):76-85. 10.1520/GTJ101219
  10. Shehata H, Sorour T, Fayed A. Effect of stone column installation on soft clay behavior. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2018. 10.1080/19386362.2018.1478245
  11. Mohanty P, Samanta M. Experimental and numerical studies on response of the stone column in layered soil. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng. 2015;1:1-14. 10.1007/s40891-015-0029-z
  12. Basack S, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C. Modeling the performance of stone column–reinforced soft ground under static and cyclic loads. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2016;142(2):04015067. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001378
  13. Schweiger H, Pande G. Numerical analysis of stone column supported foundations. Comput Geotech. 1986;2(6):347-72. 10.1016/0266-352X(86)90030-3
  14. Gholaminejad A, Mahboubi A, Noorzad A. Hybrid Continuous-Discrete Modeling of an Ordinary Stone Column and Micromechanical Investigations. Geotech Geol Eng. 2021;39(4):3249-64. 10.1007/s10706-021-01692-4
  15. Indraratna B, Ngo NT, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Sloan SW. Coupled discrete element-finite difference method for analysing the load-deformation behaviour of a single stone column in soft soil. Comput Geotech. 2015;63:267-78. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.10.002
  16. Tan X, Feng LJ, Hu ZB, Abbas SM. The equivalent shear strength properties of the composite soil reinforced by stone columns: an FDM-DEM-coupled numerical evaluation. Environ Earth Sci. 2021;80(4):12. 10.1007/s12665-021-09412-0
  17. Tan X, Feng LJ, Hu ZB, Zhao MH. A DEM-FDM coupled numerical study on the deformation and failure process of the isolated stone column in soft soil. Bull Eng Geol Environ. 2020;79(4):1693-705. 10.1007/s10064-019-01671-3
  18. Tan X, Zhao MH, Chen W. Numerical Simulation of a Single Stone Column in Soft Clay Using the Discrete-Element Method. Int J Geomech. 2018;18(12):12. 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001308
  19. Mohapatra SR, Rajagopal K, Sharma J. 3-Dimensional numerical modeling of geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Geotext Geomembr. 2017;45(3):131-41. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.01.004
  20. Cundall PA, Strack OD. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. geotechnique. 1979;29(1):47-65. 10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47
  21. Itasca. PFC3D manual, Version 6.0. 2016.
  22. Yan Y, Ji S. Discrete element modeling of direct shear tests for a granular material. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 2010;34(9):978-90. 10.1002/nag.848
  23. Potts D, Dounias G, Vaughan P. Finite element analysis of the direct shear box test. Geotechnique. 1987;37(1):11-23. 10.1680/geot.1987.37.1.11
  24. Yunjia W, Erxiang S. Discrete element analysis of the particle shape effect on packing density and strength of rockfills. Rock and Soil Mechanics. 2019;40(6):2416-26.
  25. O'Sullivan C. Particulate discrete element modelling: a geomechanics perspective: CRC Press; 2011.
  26. Duncan JM, Buchignani A. An Engineering Manual for Settlement Studies: By JM Duncan and AL Buchignani: Department of Civil Engineering, University of California; 1976.
International Journal of Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 9
TRANSACTIONS C: Aspects
September 2024
Pages 1790-1799

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics